Since Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), Florida dissolution law applies to same-sex married couples on identical terms. Several issues still arise disproportionately for LGBTQ families: a legal marriage date that is far shorter than the relationship, and parentage for a parent with no biological connection to the child. RNC Legal represents LGBTQ clients in Florida dissolution, parentage, and adoption matters.
Equal Law, Unequal Starting Points
In Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015), the Supreme Court held that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry and to have marriages recognized. Florida dissolution law has applied to same-sex married couples on the same terms since. Equitable distribution, alimony, time-sharing, and support are governed by the same chapter 61 provisions regardless of the spouses’ sexes.
Formal equality has not eliminated the practical problems, because Florida family law measures many rights from the date of the legal marriage — and for same-sex couples that date is often far later than the date the partnership actually began.
The result is a category of cases where the legal record understates the relationship, and where the lawyer’s task is to put the full history in front of the court through the mechanisms the statute does allow.
The Marriage Date Problem
Consider a couple together since 2002 who married in 2016 and divorce now. Florida would generally treat that as a marriage of under ten years — short-term for purposes of the alimony framework in Fla. Stat. § 61.08, which ties both the availability and the duration of durational alimony to the length of the marriage. The twenty-plus years before the license are not automatically counted.
Equitable distribution raises a parallel issue. Assets accumulated during the pre-marital partnership are not automatically marital simply because the couple would have married earlier had the law permitted it. A home bought together in 2008, titled in one name, does not become marital by virtue of the relationship alone.
There are avenues, and they are evidentiary rather than automatic. Jointly titled property, commingled accounts, marital funds and effort applied to a nonmarital asset, and documented mutual contribution can all establish marital or equitable interests. Florida courts also retain discretion within § 61.075 and § 61.08 to consider the parties’ actual circumstances. None of this is guaranteed, and the outcome depends on the records that exist — which is why these cases reward early document gathering.
Parentage When Only One Parent Is Biological
The most serious exposure for LGBTQ families in Florida is usually not property. It is the legal status of a parent who has raised a child without a biological connection or an adoption.
A child born during a marriage is generally presumed to be a child of the marriage, which provides meaningful protection for married same-sex parents. That presumption is a starting point rather than an absolute, and it does not help couples who were never married or who separated before marrying.
Florida has moved on this. In T.M.H. v. D.M.T., 129 So. 3d 320 (Fla. 2013), the Florida Supreme Court recognized the parental rights of a woman who provided ova used to conceive a child carried by her same-sex partner, holding that applying the assisted reproduction statute to extinguish her parental rights was unconstitutional on those facts. Florida’s categorical bar on adoption by gay people was also held unconstitutional in Florida Department of Children & Families v. In re Adoption of X.X.G., 45 So. 3d 79 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).
Even so, adoption remains the most secure route. A stepparent or second-parent adoption under Fla. Stat. ch. 63 produces a court judgment of parentage that is entitled to recognition in other states. Relying on a presumption is weaker than holding an adoption decree, particularly for families who travel or relocate.
Assisted Reproduction and Planning
Florida addresses assisted reproductive technology at Fla. Stat. § 742.11, which generally provides that a donor relinquishes parental rights and responsibilities, with the statute treating the commissioning couple differently from donors. Gestational surrogacy is addressed separately in chapter 742.
Because these provisions were not drafted with same-sex families as their primary subject, outcomes can turn on how a particular arrangement maps onto statutory categories. Documentation created before conception — donor agreements, surrogacy contracts, clinic consents, and pre-birth or post-birth orders where available — does far more to protect a family than litigation afterward.
For families formed before marriage, or in another state, or through an arrangement that was never papered, the planning work is to build the strongest available record now rather than discovering a gap during a separation or a medical emergency.
| Issue | Florida position |
|---|---|
| Marriage equality | Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015) |
| Dissolution law | Fla. Stat. ch. 61 applies identically to same-sex spouses |
| Marriage length | Alimony availability and duration tie to the legal marriage date (§ 61.08) |
| Parentage | Children born during a marriage are generally presumed children of the marriage |
| Assisted reproduction | Fla. Stat. § 742.11; see T.M.H. v. D.M.T. (Fla. 2013) |
| Adoption | Fla. Stat. ch. 63 — a judgment of adoption is the most portable protection |
Matters We Handle
- Same-sex dissolution of marriage and marital settlement agreements
- Long pre-marital partnerships and the marriage-date problem
- Equitable distribution of jointly acquired pre-marriage property
- Parentage establishment for non-biological parents
- Stepparent and second-parent adoption under chapter 63
- Assisted reproduction, donor, and surrogacy documentation
- Time-sharing and parenting plans for LGBTQ families
- Cross-state recognition and relocation planning
Frequently Asked Questions
Is same-sex divorce handled differently in Florida?
No. Since Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), Florida applies the same chapter 61 framework to all married couples. Equitable distribution, alimony, time-sharing, and support are governed by identical provisions.
We were together twenty years but only married in 2016. Does the court count the earlier years?
Not automatically. Florida generally measures the length of the marriage from the legal marriage date, which affects the alimony framework under § 61.08. The earlier years can still matter evidentially — through jointly titled property, commingling, and documented mutual contribution — but establishing that requires records rather than argument.
I am not biologically related to my child and never adopted. What is my status?
It depends heavily on the facts. If the child was born during your marriage, the presumption that a child born in wedlock is a child of the marriage generally applies. Outside marriage the position is weaker. Florida has recognized parental rights in this area, including in T.M.H. v. D.M.T., but a stepparent or second-parent adoption remains the most secure and the most portable protection.
Will a Florida adoption be recognized in other states?
A judgment of adoption is a court judgment and is generally entitled to recognition in other states, which is a principal reason adoption is preferred over relying on a presumption of parentage. This is particularly relevant for families who relocate or travel frequently.
Can we fix our documentation now, before there is a dispute?
Usually yes, and it is far more effective than acting afterward. Adoption, parentage orders, properly drafted donor or surrogacy agreements, estate planning, and clear titling of jointly acquired property are all best handled while the family is intact.
Family matters are decided on documents and dates as much as on argument. Bring what you have and we will tell you candidly where you stand. Consultations are free and confidential.
Schedule Free Consultation