A Florida property owner can be liable when a criminal attack was foreseeable — usually shown through prior similar crimes on or near the property — and the owner failed to provide reasonable security. Since 2023, Fla. Stat. §768.0706 gives multifamily residential owners a presumption against liability if they implement specified security measures.
| Key question | Florida answer |
|---|---|
| Core legal question | Was the criminal attack reasonably foreseeable to the property owner? |
| How foreseeability is shown | Prior similar incidents on or near the property; area crime data. |
| 2023 safe harbor | §768.0706 — presumption against liability for compliant apartment complexes. |
| Common locations | Apartments, hotels, bars, parking garages, shopping centers, gas stations. |
| Do I need a criminal conviction? | No. The civil claim is against the property owner, not the attacker. |
| Deadline to file suit | Generally 2 years for negligence claims. |
What a Negligent Security Claim Actually Is
Negligent security is a specialized branch of premises liability. The theory is not that the property owner attacked you — it is that the owner knew or should have known that criminal activity was reasonably foreseeable on the property, and failed to take reasonable measures to protect the people they invited there.
Florida property owners owe invitees a duty of reasonable care. Where violent crime is foreseeable, discharging that duty can require functioning locks, adequate lighting, working cameras, controlled access, and in some settings, security personnel.
Foreseeability Is the Whole Case
Every negligent security case turns on whether the attack was foreseeable. That is established through evidence the owner had, or should have had, notice that violent crime was a genuine risk:
- Prior similar incidents on the property — the single strongest category of proof.
- Police call histories for the address, often revealing dozens or hundreds of calls.
- Area crime data for the immediate surrounding blocks.
- Tenant and guest complaints about lighting, broken gates, loitering, or drug activity.
- Internal incident reports and security company logs.
- Prior warnings from law enforcement or insurers.
A property with a documented history of armed robberies in its parking lot cannot credibly claim the next armed robbery was unforeseeable.
The 2023 Safe Harbor for Apartment Complexes
Florida's 2023 legislative changes added Fla. Stat. §768.0706, which materially altered the landscape for multifamily residential properties. Owners of apartment complexes who substantially implement specified security measures receive a presumption against liability for criminal acts by third parties.
Those measures generally include items such as:
- Security camera coverage at entry and exit points, retained for a specified period
- Lighting to defined standards in parking lots, walkways, and laundry rooms
- Deadbolt locks on dwelling unit doors and locking devices on windows and sliding doors
- Locked gates at pool and common area fences
- A peephole or viewer on each dwelling unit door
- A documented crime prevention through environmental design assessment
This is a presumption, not immunity. Whether an owner actually implemented and maintained these measures — as opposed to claiming to have done so — is a factual question, and cameras that were installed but non-functional, or lighting that was specified but burned out, are exactly the kinds of failures that matter. Claims involving hotels, bars, retail, and parking facilities fall outside this particular safe harbor.
Where These Attacks Happen
- Apartment complexes — assaults and shootings in parking areas, stairwells, and breezeways
- Hotels and motels — room invasions, corridor assaults, and inadequate key control
- Bars and nightclubs — violence involving overserved patrons or absent, untrained security staff
- Parking garages and lots — robberies and carjackings in poorly lit, uncontrolled structures
- Shopping centers and gas stations — armed robberies at locations with known histories
- Office and commercial buildings — unsecured after-hours access
Comparative Fault and the Attacker's Share
Florida's modified comparative negligence rule applies: a claimant more than 50% at fault recovers nothing, and recovery is otherwise reduced proportionally. Property owners also commonly argue that the criminal actor bears the fault, seeking to apportion responsibility to a non-party assailant.
That argument does not automatically succeed. The entire premise of a negligent security claim is that the owner's failure created the conditions in which foreseeable crime occurred. Establishing the owner's independent share of responsibility is central to these cases.
Evidence That Disappears Fast
These claims are document- and time-intensive. Surveillance footage may cycle within days. Police reports, computer-aided dispatch records, and incident logs must be requested. Security company contracts, guard schedules, post orders, and maintenance records for lighting and gates are held by the defendant and obtained through discovery.
The sooner preservation demands go out and public records requests are filed, the more complete the record will be.
Injuries and Damages
Negligent security cases frequently involve the most severe injuries in personal injury practice — gunshot and stab wounds, traumatic brain injury from beatings, permanent disability, and death. Alongside medical expenses and lost earning capacity, these claims often involve substantial psychological harm, including post-traumatic stress, which is a legitimate and compensable element of damages.
How RNC Legal Handles Negligent Security Cases
We build the foreseeability record through police call histories, prior incident evidence, and area crime data; test whether a property claiming the §768.0706 safe harbor genuinely complied; obtain security contracts, guard logs, and maintenance records; work with security and premises safety professionals where warranted; and document both the physical and psychological consequences of the attack. We handle these claims throughout Florida on a contingency fee.
Frequently Asked Questions
The attacker was never caught. Do I still have a case?
Yes. A negligent security claim is brought against the property owner or manager for failing to provide reasonable security — not against the assailant. Whether the attacker was identified, arrested, or convicted does not determine the civil claim, though criminal records can be useful evidence.
How is 'foreseeability' actually proven?
Most often through prior similar incidents: police call histories for the address, prior robberies or assaults on the property, crime statistics for the immediate area, tenant complaints, and internal incident reports. If the owner knew violent crime was occurring and did not respond reasonably, foreseeability is established.
What does the 2023 apartment safe harbor law do?
Fla. Stat. §768.0706 creates a presumption against liability for owners of multifamily residential properties who substantially implement specified measures — such as lighting to defined standards, security cameras at entries, locking devices, and a documented crime prevention assessment. It is a presumption, not absolute immunity, and whether an owner genuinely complied is often contested.
What kinds of security failures support a claim?
Commonly: broken or absent gates and door locks, burned-out or inadequate lighting, non-functioning or unmonitored cameras, removal of previously provided security guards, propped or unrepaired entry doors, and failure to warn residents or guests about known recent crime on the property.
Can I bring a claim if I was hurt at a hotel or bar?
Yes. Negligent security claims are not limited to apartments. Hotels, bars and nightclubs, parking garages, shopping centers, gas stations, and office buildings all owe invitees a duty of reasonable care, which can include reasonable security measures where crime is foreseeable.
Consultations are free and confidential, and injury cases are handled on a contingency fee — you owe no attorney fee unless we recover for you.
Schedule Free Consultation